Complex Event Processing and Enterprise
What is complex event processing? For the uninitiated let me start by scratching the surface of some theoretical computer science as an introduction. The solvability of computationally complex programmable algorithms in software design is governed by the ability to benchmark them against non-deterministic polynomial (NP) time, polynomial (P) time, or the grey fuzzy cloud of the unknown complexity known as NP-Complete. This school of thought, however, is well known and there’s even a prize of one-million-dollars for the person who can derive a proof providing evidence to show that solvable problems in complexity class P are equal to those in class NP – i.e. P = NP. But what has this got to do with a corporate enterprise? And what has computational complexity got to do with complex event processing?
Let’s consider the current state of the economic downturn as an example. The repercussions of the subprime mortgage crisis across the Atlantic come through in short bursts, we’d typically experience ripples which were for the most part predictable – such as those coming through the conservatorship of the Federal National Mortgage Association (you’ll probably know of them as ‘Fannie Mae’) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (again, commonly known as ‘Freddie Mac’). But as the big corporate names started to fall – such as AIG (acquired by US Federal Government), Lehman Brothers (bankruptcy), and Merrill Lynch (acquired by Bank of America) – the ripples were coming through stronger and at an accelerated pace. Now as we are in the midst of a global recession, the volatility and shear unpredictability of the economy means for business to stay afloat they must remain competitive in preparation for the upturn. In order to do so, enterprises must operate with an agility to respond proactively to oscillations in the economy, helping them to address the challenges in a rapidly evolving economy.
Fundamentally, tackling unpredictable events – such as rapid changes during a recession – is about quantifying the impact of such an event and thus being able to derive a weighted approaching to prioritising the processing of events in the least disruptive manner. A common approach to this is to conceptualise an event, more specifically to recognise the hallmarks of an event and to better understand what the repercussions could be. This forms the basis of complex event processing. More formally complex event processing can be explained as “a technique that helps discover complex, inferred events by analysing and correlating other events”.
So how does complex event processing relate to IT within the corporate enterprise? With corporate software architecture developing into a service-oriented architecture, and that coupled with the rapid adoption of radio frequency identification, event processing is well suited to fit in enterprise information systems in terms of facilitation of event aggregation into high-level actionable information, and improving the responsiveness. And as you can see, complexity in IT isn’t just about overcoming the challenges of building complex software systems by designing efficient algorithms – it’s also about understanding what happens when minor ‘events’ come together to cause a major complex event, and how best to tackle these in a methodical order.
I’d be fascinated to hear your thoughts on this, and to hear of any examples of complex event processing occurring at your workplace.
Navigate
Recent posts
March 2010
Raleigh 10A Phase 1 - Kiulu Valley and Crocker Ridge Trek:
Comments (0)
February 2010
Technology Predictions for 2010
Comments (2)
January 2010
Comments (0)
December 2009
Raleigh 09K Phase 3 and End of Expedition:
Comments (1)
November 2009
Raleigh 09K Phase 2 - Gravity Water Feed
Comments (0)
Comments (0)
October 2009
Comments (0)
September 2009
Comments (0)
August 2009
Comments (0)
July 2009
Comments (0)
June 2009
Comments (0)
Comments (0)
May 2009
Complex Event Processing and Enterprise
Comments (3)
Comments (0)
April 2009
Smartphone - smart choice or security risk?
Comments (0)
SOA in the 'Trough of Disillusionment'
Comments (0)
Comments (0)
March 2009
Comments (0)
Comments (0)
Comments (0)
February 2009
What Ever Happened to Distributed Computing?
Comments (0)
Capgemini Raleigh International Event 2008 - grads get their hands dirty for the Awkright Society.
Comments (0)
Between A. Rock and a hard... case.
Comments (0)
Facebook for Business... you must be joking?
Comments (0)
January 2009
Being Green and the Impact of Technology
Comments (0)
WOA a top 10 strategic technology! SOA dead! What’s going on?
Comments (0)
Externalisation & Web3D: A Corporate View
Comments (2)
December 2008
Comments (0)
Comments (0)
Comments (0)
Comments (0)
November 2008
New blogger! Let me introduce myself...
Comments (0)
So Long, Farewell, Auf Wiedersehen, Goodbye ... and the Nokia Morph
Comments (0)
It's been a busy period on the BTC
Comments (0)
October 2008
A little thinking goes a long way…
Comments (0)
September 2008
Comments (0)
Comments (0)
August 2008
Getting a Leading Edge on the Graduate Recruitment Process
Comments (1)
Microsoft's Answer to Cloud Computing
Comments (0)
July 2008
Comments (0)
Dragons Spotted in London : The BTC Challenge
Comments (0)
Boku: Programming is Child's Play
Comments (0)
Comments (0)
May 2008
Skills, Skills and More Skills
Comments (0)
iPlayer : Bandwidth Hog or Multimedia Marvel?
Comments (0)
April 2008
Comments (0)
Comments (0)
Comments (0)
Introduction – Do you really need a Technology Degree to be a Technology Consultant?
Comments (0)
March 2008
Comments (0)
In the beginning there was ...
Comments (0)





http://www.amazon.com/Black-Swan-Impact-Highly-Imp...
sidenote: I don't like the authors writing style, he comes across as very arrogant but the book gets you thinking about some interesting concepts though I question some of its conclusions. # Posted By Ryan Hamilton | 6/4/09 7:20 PM